Rijal Al Kashi Report 176 Link Jun 2026
Understanding specific reports or narrations within early biographical dictionaries requires navigating the intersection of . Contextualizing Rijal al-Kashi
: The report rejects tribalism and inherited status as measures of worth, placing religious devotion ( taqwa ) as the only valid criterion.
Why should a student care about ? Because it directly impacts the grading of thousands of Hadith in Usul al-Kafi and Tahdhib al-Ahkam .
Najashi tends to label Fathi narrators as fāsid al-madhhab (corrupt in sect) but still potentially thiqah in transmission. Report 176 aligns more with al-Tusi’s cautious view: take from them what matches mainstream Imami doctrine, reject what contradicts.
Sunni traditionalists and historians often point to reports of this nature to prove that the reconciliation between Imam Hasan and Mu'awiyah was an absolute, legally binding political submission. Rijal Al Kashi Report 176
Do you need the of this specific entry?
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
The consensus among Shia scholars, from al-Kashi himself to modern authorities like Ayatollah al-Khoei, is that Report 176 must be understood through the lens of .
The text records a discussion involving a group of scholars debating the credentials of Mughira bin Sa’id and his status as a liar and heretic. Because it directly impacts the grading of thousands
Accepting a position under an oppressive system makes one a participant in that injustice. Significance in Shia Thought
Critics, including researchers on Shia scholarly forums, note that Rijal al-Kashi is a work of (biographical appraisal), not a primary hadith book like
While the exact translation varies, the core of involves Imam al-Sadiq issuing a severe condemnation—comparing a specific deviant group to dogs of Hell —while simultaneously acknowledging that these individuals claim loyalty to the Ahl al-Bayt.
The report highlights the internal friction within the early Shīʿa community during the late Umayyad and early Abbasid eras, illustrating how political marginalisation created breeding grounds for esoteric and radical interpretations. Analytical and Jurisprudential Reception Sunni traditionalists and historians often point to reports
Do you think later scholars like al-Hilli or al-Majlisi applied Report 176 consistently, or did they default to condemning all Fathis? References from Khulasa or Mir’at al-Uqul welcome.
, as seen in other reports like Report 358 , which discusses the merit of Taqwa (piety) over lineage. Analytical Importance for Researchers
the specific terms of tyrant ruler (Sultan Ja'ir) in this context.
This complex structure creates a critical question: Are we to accept a historical report from a respected scholar about an earlier one, or does such a commentary, added by an intermediary, lack the authority to overturn a narrator's established positive reputation? This dilemma is the heart of the rijal scholar's work.
remains even when one is "just following orders" as a tribal or community leader. Rijal Al-Kashi - General Islamic Discussion - ShiaChat.com
